| Rating | Review |
| Awesome | From: Programmer Used: < 6 months Comments: One word ... NICE !!! |
| Very Good | From: guenter Used: 6 months to 2 years Comments: Very easy to use (if you knew some kind of BASIC before), o.k. still someway incomplete (!beta!), ?slow? depends on what you want to do... best of all: IT WORKS WITH LINUX !! (that's good for me, I like Linux, but I hate its native programing-perversion called C, C++ or what ever, RapidQ is just the thing made for me... try it, you wont be really disappointed!! |
| Awesome | From: A programmer Used: < 6 months Comments: I only started programming last month... I can't believe how easy Rapid-Q is! I just can't believe it is free, especially when Visual Basic (standard edition, no extras) is selling for 110. Thanks! |
| Awesome | From: A new programmer Used: < 6 months Comments: This is soo cool! It's VERY simple to use. I was upset that the only thing that I knew how to make programs on was Learn To Program Basic (LTPB) from shareware. It wouldn't let me make programs as aplications. If I wanted to give a program to a friend, they would have to have LTPB also. This solves all my problems!! Thank you!! I do need a little help, if you could spare it. The instructions seem a little....brief and abreviated. If you could E-Mail me more complete instructions as to using the icons and then turning them into code, please do. |
| Crap'ola | From: ByteBreaker Used: 6 months to 2 years Comments: This thing suck!!!! <expletive> R rated comments, view source of this page to see all gory details, you've been warned. </expletive> see me at DALNET IRC SERVER #ONEBALL |
| Good | From: artangel Used: < 6 months Comments: It's free it's easy and it's still good for me!... |
| Awesome | From: NeoTiger Used: < 6 months Comments: This is a really easy to use quality BASIC flavour! |
| Awesome | From: Paul M Used: < 6 months Comments: William I'm going to have to hand it to you. You did a bang up job with this amazing compiler. You really shouldn't call it a beta though it is far too good. One last thing, what ever you do KEEP IT FREEWARE, ok? |
| Awesome | From: Sam Thursfield (Golrien the Corpse) Used: < 6 months Comments: Great! The form editor that produces code is a little disconcerting, but it's AWESOME nevertheless. |
| Awesome | From: Jaap Blenk Used: < 6 months Comments: William, you did a great job! You call this a beta version. You're too modest. I've programmed for many years and never seen such a comprehensive, easy to understand and stable product. |
| Awesome | From: The Fat Contributor Used: < 6 months Comments: Blimey. When I downloaded Rapid-Q I was expecting one of those abstruse, half-finished interpreters with no documentation you find scattered around the net. Never would I have expected such a remarkably powerful and flexible programming language that remains easy to use, fast, and above all, compact. For a beta version, it's more refined than many commercial products out there. Absolutely brilliant! |
| Awesome | From: ljones Used: < 6 months Comments: Now this is an intresting version of basic. Up until recently I was still using Visual basic for dos, I didn't even bother with the horrible Visual Basic for Windows or Windows C++. One of the great things about RapidQ is that is *isn't* bloatware -- it's one of the few windows programs that'll run straight from a floppy disk. Reminds me of my old Amiga and Hisoft Basic :-) Very good programming lanuage, and :-) it's free too -- unless I really need to I've all but stopped using vb for dos!! (Thinks)... Actually I would like to say RapidQ IS VERY good indeed. It beats 10 bells out of Visual basic (urgh!)! It's intresting, the same "spirit" that I could find in the old Amiga Hisoft Basic V1.05 I find in RapidQ :-) macrofurry website: http://website.lineone.net/~ljones/evoluTiON/evoluTiON.html |
| Awesome | From: Nick Used: < 6 months Comments: COOL! It's sooo easy to use! I'm currently working on porting a FLI player to it, and it's going well, except for some problems with streams. I recently got some stuff for writing Win32 programs in assembly language, and I really have fun writing ASM .DLL's to speed up my programs! |
| Awesome | From: morrisd Used: < 6 months Comments: So easy to grasp and one can see the potential. It deserves maximum support. |
| Very Good | From: kimono Used: < 6 months Comments: Un tres bon Basic aux instructions tres completes et souvent mis a jour. Merci beaucoup. |
| Awesome | From: maeliman Used: < 6 months Comments: What a language... it is real easy to speak with, no + no ++ just that... COOL, even more COOOOL if it support ODBC as what people are eyeing now.. Bravo William.. what a Will i am.. |
| Awesome | From: timelord Used: < 6 months Comments: If you have absolutely no experience in writing any kind of program and are curious. Try Rapid-Q. It is easy to learn. It's powerful. And it is FREE. You can't lose. |
| Awesome | From: Thomas Simers Used: 6 months to 2 years Comments: So far I've found few limitations on what I have thought to or tried to do with RapidQ, and most of those have been quickly repaired when I asked the mailing list about them....William is a wonder, and so is his language! ...now, if MS acted like William....Windows might work before its officially released..... |
| Very Good | From: EdGe Used: < 6 months Comments: It's a very good language and I would suggest it for beginners, it's a lot more simple than C/C++/VBasic..very nice. |
| Awesome | From: Undisclosed Used: < 6 months Comments: I used to do C/C++ programming, but I was stuck in dumb old DOS. The only thing that I could make in windows using C/C++ was a message box... LOL Keep up the good work William! Rapid-Q is COOL!!! |
| Awesome | From: Merlin Xaviar Used: < 6 months Comments: Very powerful language for a beta. With more support on directx and directx3d and both extended and expanded memory support, it could become the language of choice. I used to use Visual Basic, but not now! Why would I use a complicated language when I could use a simpler one that is just as powerful to do what I need. Keep updating it and you will have a winner. |
| Very Good | From: Xlark Used: 6 months to 2 years Comments: Starting to become a very good compiler. Some stuff missing, but hey it's a beta. |
| Awesome | From: Alexie Used: < 6 months Comments: This is looking better and better. |